Abstract

Since the 1970s, local governments have utilized similar redevelopment tools to counteract economic dislocations but cities often experience divergent development pathways. This project explores why these divergences occur through a comparative case study of a college town and factory town in Indiana. Qualitatively, I compile data from interviews with city officials, local government documents, and related research to address the towns’ divergent development paths. Two findings are noteworthy. First, a locality’s extant resources act as path-dependent liabilities for local growth. Second, state and federal aid greatly assists local development. Yet the defunding of these revenue streams, and a city’s reliance on specific types of funding, positions each city in a more or less advantageous position for future prosperity. These results suggest that local development is best understood as the interplay between local infrastructures, various intergovernmental incentives, and the needs of capital.

Keywords

Social sciences, Indiana cities, Political economy, United States, Urban development

Disciplines

Sociology

Degree Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Department

Sociology

First Advisor

Richard Hogan

Committee Chair

Richard Hogan

Committee Member 1

Larry DeBoer

Committee Member 2

Robert Perrucci

Committee Member 3

Jon Teaford

Date of Award

8-2016

Download

Included in

Sociology Commons

Share

COinS