Abstract
Four projects on I-65 were selected, designed, and constructed as 2020 ATL (added travel lanes) projects. During the pavement design stages, six alternatives with MEPDG (Mechanistic Pavement Design Guide) analysis, cost (per lane miles), and LCCA (life cycle cost analysis) were considered. Ultimately all projects were selected to be total reconstruction with an alternate bid (HMA vs. concrete) in anticipation of a lower bidding cost. In the end, INDOT saved 14% on these projects ($200M total cost). In this session we will describe various alternate pavement design analyses with cost analysis.
Session Number
115
Session Title
2020 ATL Pavement Design Case Study
Track Title
Pavements
Location
STEW306
Date of Version
March 2016
Recommended Citation
Dave, Kumar P. and Patel, Pankaj, "2020 ATL Pavement Design: A Case Study" (2016). Purdue Road School. 69.
https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/roadschool/2016/presentations/69
Start Date
3-9-2016 3:00 PM
End Date
3-9-2016 3:50 PM
2020 ATL Pavement Design: A Case Study
STEW306
Four projects on I-65 were selected, designed, and constructed as 2020 ATL (added travel lanes) projects. During the pavement design stages, six alternatives with MEPDG (Mechanistic Pavement Design Guide) analysis, cost (per lane miles), and LCCA (life cycle cost analysis) were considered. Ultimately all projects were selected to be total reconstruction with an alternate bid (HMA vs. concrete) in anticipation of a lower bidding cost. In the end, INDOT saved 14% on these projects ($200M total cost). In this session we will describe various alternate pavement design analyses with cost analysis.