Event Description/Abstract

Management of highway assets, including pavements, is immensely challenging in an era of uncertain funding for transportation agencies and higher service expectations from the public. Furthermore, the maintenance of pavement assets in good serviceable condition is one of the most cost-intensive operations for a highway agency.

Between 1996 and 2008, the Indiana DOT spending on improvement of pavement assets fluctuated between 35% and 50% of its asset management budget annually (Everett2012). Therefore, pavement managers are constantly exploring strategies to fulfill their mission of maintaining roads in good condition with the minimumbudget. Strategies may include examining the effectiveness of individual pavement treatments or assessing approaches to prioritizing pavement needs for fund allocation.

A network-level approach for cost control that remains to be examined deeply is the change in trigger policy for pavement project implementation. Changes in the trigger policy undoubtedly have an influence on the budget that will be required and the resulting pavement conditions at the network level. A pavement treatment threshold modification strategy would aid agencies in the face of budget restriction. However, implementation of such a strategy would have to occur only after projection of the long-term influence of a certain treatment trigger policy on the pavement conditions at the network level.

This paper explores the impact of changing the pavement rehabilitation trigger policy and varying the available budget on pavement roughness condition at the network-level. The Indiana State Urban road network is used as a case study.

Share

COinS
 

Examining the Impact of Pavement Rehabilitation Trigger Values and Annual Rehabilitation Funding on the Long-term Network-Level Pavement Condition: A Case Study with the Indiana State Urban Road Network

Management of highway assets, including pavements, is immensely challenging in an era of uncertain funding for transportation agencies and higher service expectations from the public. Furthermore, the maintenance of pavement assets in good serviceable condition is one of the most cost-intensive operations for a highway agency.

Between 1996 and 2008, the Indiana DOT spending on improvement of pavement assets fluctuated between 35% and 50% of its asset management budget annually (Everett2012). Therefore, pavement managers are constantly exploring strategies to fulfill their mission of maintaining roads in good condition with the minimumbudget. Strategies may include examining the effectiveness of individual pavement treatments or assessing approaches to prioritizing pavement needs for fund allocation.

A network-level approach for cost control that remains to be examined deeply is the change in trigger policy for pavement project implementation. Changes in the trigger policy undoubtedly have an influence on the budget that will be required and the resulting pavement conditions at the network level. A pavement treatment threshold modification strategy would aid agencies in the face of budget restriction. However, implementation of such a strategy would have to occur only after projection of the long-term influence of a certain treatment trigger policy on the pavement conditions at the network level.

This paper explores the impact of changing the pavement rehabilitation trigger policy and varying the available budget on pavement roughness condition at the network-level. The Indiana State Urban road network is used as a case study.