Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is caused by the accelerated death of dopamine (DA) producing neurons. Numerous studies documenting cognitive deficits of PD patients have revealed impairments in a variety of tasks related to memory, learning, visuospatial skills, and attention. While there have been several studies documenting cognitive deficits of PD patients, very few computational models have been proposed. In this article, we use the COVIS model of category learning to simulate DA depletion and show that the model suffers from cognitive symptoms similar to those of human participants affected by PD. Specifically, DA depletion in COVIS produced deficits in rule-based categorization, nonlinear information-integration categorization, probabilistic classification, rule maintenance, and rule switching. These were observed by simulating results from younger controls, older controls, PD patients, and severe PD patients in five well-known tasks. Differential performance among the different age groups and clinical populations was modeled simply by changing the amount of DA available in the model. This suggests that COVIS may not only be an adequate model of the simulated tasks and phenomena but also more generally of the role of DA in these tasks and phenomena.
Keywords
Parkinson’s disease, computational modeling, COVIS, perceptual categorization, probabilistic classification, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST).
Date of this Version
2012
DOI
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.033
Recommended Citation
Hélie, Sébastien; Paul, Erick J.; and Ashby, F Gregory, "A Neurocomputational Account of Cognitive Deficits in Parkinson's Disease" (2012). Department of Psychological Sciences Faculty Publications. Paper 48.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.033
Comments
“NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Neuropsychologia. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Neuropsychologia, [50, 9, (2012)] DOI#10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.033