Location
University of Leeds
Keywords
Lithomarge; Geopolymer mortars; Portland cement mortars; Sulfate attack, Acid attack.
Abstract
The resistance of room temperature cured geopolymer mortar (GPM) against chemical attacks, i.e. sodium and magnesium sulfate solutions, and sulfuric and hydrochloric acid solutions, was evaluated. GPM was formulated using a lithomarge precursor (low-purity kaolin) to achieve 28-day characteristic compressive strength of 60 MPa. Its performance was compared with an equivalent Portland cement mortar (PCM) having the same paste volume and strength grade. 28-day old bar samples were stored in 0.352 mol/L sulfate solutions for 52 weeks whereas 28-day old cube samples were exposed for 8 weeks to acid solutions with concentration of 0.52 mol/L. GPM showed superior performance against sulfate attack when compared to PCM. No visual deterioration was observed in GPM, the length changes were relatively small, and no changes to the microstructure were detected – in contrast to severely deteriorated PCM. As confirmed by visual observations and lower mass loss, GPM showed better resistance to attack by both acids than PCM. GPM provided a better quality (lower permeability) of an acid-degraded layer, lowering the degree of further deterioration. The main mechanisms of the matrix deterioration of GPM in both acids was dealumination of the hardened binder, with a higher degree of changes detected for sulfuric acid.
Included in
Comparison of lithomarge and cement-based mortars performance in aggressive aqueous environments
University of Leeds
The resistance of room temperature cured geopolymer mortar (GPM) against chemical attacks, i.e. sodium and magnesium sulfate solutions, and sulfuric and hydrochloric acid solutions, was evaluated. GPM was formulated using a lithomarge precursor (low-purity kaolin) to achieve 28-day characteristic compressive strength of 60 MPa. Its performance was compared with an equivalent Portland cement mortar (PCM) having the same paste volume and strength grade. 28-day old bar samples were stored in 0.352 mol/L sulfate solutions for 52 weeks whereas 28-day old cube samples were exposed for 8 weeks to acid solutions with concentration of 0.52 mol/L. GPM showed superior performance against sulfate attack when compared to PCM. No visual deterioration was observed in GPM, the length changes were relatively small, and no changes to the microstructure were detected – in contrast to severely deteriorated PCM. As confirmed by visual observations and lower mass loss, GPM showed better resistance to attack by both acids than PCM. GPM provided a better quality (lower permeability) of an acid-degraded layer, lowering the degree of further deterioration. The main mechanisms of the matrix deterioration of GPM in both acids was dealumination of the hardened binder, with a higher degree of changes detected for sulfuric acid.
