Students' awareness and perceptions of learning engineering: Content and construct validation of an instrument

Daphne S Duncan-Wiles, Purdue University

Abstract

With the recent addition of engineering to most K-12 testable state standards, efficient and comprehensive instruments are needed to assess changes in student knowledge and perceptions of engineering. In this study, I developed the Students' Awareness and Perceptions of Learning Engineering (STAPLE) instrument to quantitatively measure fourth through eighth grade students' knowledge of, interest in, and efficacy toward engineering. STAPLE was developed using four samples for four separate analyses: content expert review (n= 15), field-test (n=40), pilot-test (n=576), and confirmatory test (n=1,007). Content experts had expertise in either engineering education or gifted education. Students in grades four through eight completed the field-test, pilot-test, and confirmatory test. Item Response Theory (IRT) analysis was used to analyze the dichotomous knowledge items, while factor analysis was used to analyze the six-point scaled interest and efficacy items. IRT analysis of the knowledge items revealed that seven items should be removed from STAPLE in order for the instrument to yield reliable results. Factor analysis on the interest and efficacy items revealed three factors: Interest in Engineering, Efficacy toward Engineering Global and Social Dynamics, and Efficacy toward Engineering Process and Design. Fit statistics were adequate for each of the factors. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that male students had higher mean factor scores for Interest in Engineering and Efficacy toward Engineering, while female students had higher factor scores for Efficacy toward Engineering Global and Social Dynamics. Additionally, students identified as gifted had higher factor scores for Engineering Global and Social Dynamics; however, students not identified as gifted had higher factor scores for Interest in Engineering and Efficacy toward Engineering Process and Design. These results have implications for engineering instruction and interventions.

Degree

Ph.D.

Advisors

Gentry, Purdue University.

Subject Area

Gifted Education|Engineering|Vocational education

Off-Campus Purdue Users:
To access this dissertation, please log in to our
proxy server
.

Share

COinS