Effects of Competition, Niche Complementarity, and Enemy Attack on Species Co-Existence and Productivity

Kliffi Maria Subida Blackstone, Purdue University

Abstract

It is no surprise that biodiversity has been decreasing at an exponential rate on the global scale because of effects such as habitat fragmentation, invasive species, spreading pathogens, and anthropogenic influences. Ecologists often found that plants in more species rich locations often exhibited higher productivity and stability in the face of stress. One such phenomenon is known as the productivity diversity relationship that implies biodiversity is key to sustaining ecosystems. Notably, while efforts are being put forth to address ecosystem destruction, much of the current tree planting strategy in the USA is based on timber profit rather than forest productivity and species coexistence with tree biology often being a secondary consideration. These thought processes are in opposition with historical experiments that indicate polyculture communities create more biomass making them significantly more productive than monocultures. However, we also acknowledge that it is not simply biodiversity that must be taken into consideration for a productive ecosystem but also species interaction through coexistence indicate whether or not a community will persevere. These interactions can be addressed using the modern coexistence theory which depends on these complementarity and fitness similarities for species to coexist through time. Here, we seek to address the importance of biodiversity in plant ecosystems. We examined the productivity-diversity relationship through the lens of the modern coexistence theory, using a combination of both experimentation and mathematical simulation. We did this by tracking and comparing the productivity of mixed and monoculture plots, analyzing the growth responses of individual trees at forest plots (Chapter 1), confirming the productivity-diversity relationship in a greenhouse experiment using local herbaceous plants (Chapter 2), and finally simulating the productivity response of monoculture vs polyculture plantations to specialist enemy attack (Chapter 3). Our research across the combination of approaches used found that species with overlapping niches and very different finesses will exclude one another due to high competition. Further, the productivity diversity correlation is necessary for ecosystem growth, but it is not sufficient for species coexistence. However, species can maintain this positive relationship despite a lack of coexistence if they maintain niche complementarity. Lastly, using a theoretic game model we were able to identify the impacts of a specialist pest on polyculture and monoculture forest. These results showed that a polyculture forest was more productive than that of a monoculture forest regardless of the presence of a specialist enemy. The results of the multiple threads of evidence found from these combined experiments indicate that while the productivity diversity correlation is important to ecosystems it is likely due to the impacts of niche complementarity that determine whether or not species will be productive within an ecosystem.

Degree

Ph.D.

Advisors

McNickle, Purdue University.

Subject Area

Agronomy|Ecology|Forestry|Wood sciences

COinS