A Critical Analysis of Asian International Student Experiences in the U.S.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to serve as a critical review of the international student research. Particularly, the paper will explore current barriers in international student research specifically for Asian international students. As Asian international students comprise most international trainees in U.S. counseling psychology programs, it is important to explore these trainees’ unique needs, especially in the wake of rising anti-Asian rhetoric and policy since COVID-19. The paper will use three frameworks for the critical review: neo-racism, critical race theory, and postcolonial theory and suggest three main barriers in international student research because of this: homogenization, overemphasis on individual factors, and the impact of stereotypes present about Asians in the U.S. Based on the frameworks used for critical review and the identified barriers, the paper will explore systemic racism in the experiences of Asian international trainees and suggest recommendations to support trainees in counseling psychology.
Degree
Ph.D.
Advisors
Case, Purdue University.
Subject Area
Asian American Studies
Off-Campus Purdue Users:
To access this dissertation, please log in to our
proxy server.