Keywords
Signal prediction, natural scenes, cones, information, hyperspectral images
Abstract
In the natural world, the past is usually a good guide to the future. If light from the sun and sky is blue earlier in the day and yellow now, then it is likely to be more yellow later, as the sun's elevation decreases. But is the light reflected from a scene into the eye as predictable as the light incident upon the scene, especially when lighting changes are not just spectral but include changes in local shadows and mutual reflections? The aim of this work was to test the predictability of cone photoreceptor signals in the wild over the course of the day. Cone signals were estimated from sequences of 7-9 time-lapse hyperspectral radiance images from four outdoor scenes in the medium-to-far distance. For each sequence, Shannon's mutual information was estimated between signals at one instant n and signals at earlier instants n - 1, n - 2, ..., 1. An asymptotically unbiased information estimator due to Kozachenko and Leonenko was used with an offset calculation to improve convergence. For all scenes, mutual information between signals at instants n and n - 1 remained roughly constant or decreased with the inclusion of signals from earlier instants. By contrast, when sequences were simulated to differ solely in spectral content, mutual information between signals at successive instants increased markedly with the addition of signals from earlier instants. In the wild, changes in local shadows and mutual reflections and other uncertainties limit the information that the past can provide about the future.
Start Date
18-5-2017 9:00 AM
End Date
18-5-2017 9:22 AM
Included in
Bioinformatics Commons, Computational Neuroscience Commons, Other Statistics and Probability Commons, Systems and Integrative Physiology Commons
Can Cone Signals in the Wild Be Predicted From the Past?
In the natural world, the past is usually a good guide to the future. If light from the sun and sky is blue earlier in the day and yellow now, then it is likely to be more yellow later, as the sun's elevation decreases. But is the light reflected from a scene into the eye as predictable as the light incident upon the scene, especially when lighting changes are not just spectral but include changes in local shadows and mutual reflections? The aim of this work was to test the predictability of cone photoreceptor signals in the wild over the course of the day. Cone signals were estimated from sequences of 7-9 time-lapse hyperspectral radiance images from four outdoor scenes in the medium-to-far distance. For each sequence, Shannon's mutual information was estimated between signals at one instant n and signals at earlier instants n - 1, n - 2, ..., 1. An asymptotically unbiased information estimator due to Kozachenko and Leonenko was used with an offset calculation to improve convergence. For all scenes, mutual information between signals at instants n and n - 1 remained roughly constant or decreased with the inclusion of signals from earlier instants. By contrast, when sequences were simulated to differ solely in spectral content, mutual information between signals at successive instants increased markedly with the addition of signals from earlier instants. In the wild, changes in local shadows and mutual reflections and other uncertainties limit the information that the past can provide about the future.