Recommended Citation
Laily, Alfu; Duncan, Robert; Gabhart, Kaitlyn M.; Nephew, Lauren D.; Christy, Shannon M.; Vadaparampil, Susan T.; Giuliano, Anna R.; and Kasting, Monica L., "Differences in Provider Hepatitis C Virus Screening Recommendations by Patient Risk Status" (2024). Purdue University Libraries Open Access Publishing Fund. Paper 237.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102602
DOI
10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102602
Date of this Version
1-9-2024
Keywords
Average risk, Hepatitus C virus, High risk, Providers, Recommendation, Screening
Abstract
Providers’ recommendation is among the strongest predictors to patients engaging in preventive care. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare providers’ Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) screening recommendation quality between high-risk and average-risk patients to determine if providers are universally recommending HCV screening, regardless of risk behaviors. This cross-sectional survey of 284 Indiana providers in 2020 assessed provider characteristics, HCV screening recommendation practices (strength, presentation, frequency, timeliness), self-efficacy, and barriers to recommending HCV screening. T-test and Chi-square compared recommendation practices for high-risk and average-risk patients. Prevalence ratios were calculated for variables associated with HCV recommendation strength comparing high-risk and average-risk patients. Logistic regression analyses examined factors associated with HCV recommendation strength for high- and average-risk patients, with odds ratios. Compared to average-risk patients, high-risk patients received higher proportion of HCV recommendations that were strong (70.4 % v. 42.4 %), routine (61.9 % v. 55.6 %), frequent (37.7 % v. 28 %), and timely (74.2 % v. 54.9 %) (P-values < 0.001). Compared to average-risk patients, providers with high-risk patients had a lower percentage of giving a strong recommendation if they were nurse practitioner (PR = 0.49). For high-risk patients, providers with higher self-efficacy (aOR = 2.16;95 %CI = 0.99–4.69) had higher odds, while those with higher perceived barriers (aOR = 0.19;95 %CI = 0.09–0.39) and those with an internal medicine specialty compared to family medicine (aOR = 0.22;95 %CI = 0.08–0.57) had lower odds of giving a strong recommendation. These data suggest providers are not universally recommending HCV screening for all adults regardless of reported risk. Future research should translate these findings into multilevel interventions to improve HCV screening recommendations regardless of patient risk status.
Comments
This is the publisher PDF of Laily, A., et al (2024) Differences in Provider Hepatitis C Virus Screening Recommendations by Patient Risk Status. Preventive Medicine Reports 38: 102602. This article is distributed under a CC-BY-NC-ND license, and is available at DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102602.