Abstract
This presentation discusses the pros and cons of using various Automated Flagger Assistance Devices (AFADs). It reviews both AFADs using STOP/SLOW signs which are currently allowed in Indiana, and Red/Yellow signal faced AFADs that are not allowed in Indiana.
The presentation points out that the principle reason for developing AFADs was to enhance worker safety by enabling flagger/operators to position themselves out of harm's way while controlling work zone traffic. However, the dominant reason for buying them seems to be to save money by only using one flagger/operator.
Various applications using AFADs are reviewed as well as potential changes to the MUTCD regarding AFADs.
Session Number
18
Session Title
Use of Automated Flagging Devices in Indiana
Track Title
Work Zone
Location
STEW 206
Date of Version
March 2013
Recommended Citation
Jones, David, "Automated Flagger Assistance Devices (AFADs)" (2013). Purdue Road School. 92.
https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/roadschool/2013/presentations/92
Start Date
3-5-2013 12:00 AM
Included in
Automated Flagger Assistance Devices (AFADs)
STEW 206
This presentation discusses the pros and cons of using various Automated Flagger Assistance Devices (AFADs). It reviews both AFADs using STOP/SLOW signs which are currently allowed in Indiana, and Red/Yellow signal faced AFADs that are not allowed in Indiana.
The presentation points out that the principle reason for developing AFADs was to enhance worker safety by enabling flagger/operators to position themselves out of harm's way while controlling work zone traffic. However, the dominant reason for buying them seems to be to save money by only using one flagger/operator.
Various applications using AFADs are reviewed as well as potential changes to the MUTCD regarding AFADs.
