<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Conference Day 2, June 22, Tuesday</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Purdue University All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2</link>
<description>Recent Events in Conference Day 2, June 22, Tuesday</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:07:18 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>





<item>
<title>Building a &apos;data repository&apos; for heterogenous technical research communities through collaborations</title>
<link>http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/10</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/10</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The paper describes the project ‘3TU.Datacentrum’, an initiative of the libraries of the three Dutch Technical Universities. Its aim is to build a data curation facility for the improvement of data management, providing data curation services for data producers of the Technical Universities and enabling data reuse.</p>
<p>The libraries initiated this project in their function as information- and knowledge brokers in emerging e-science. Playing a role in the management of research data offers an opportunity to get more thoroughly involved in the scientific process and to interconnect research data with all other sources managed by the libraries.</p>
<p>The project builds on the experience from previous TU Delft research (E-Archive and Darelux). Initial interviews with managers and researchers in leading research areas of the Technical Universities were followed by in-depth investigation of the benefits and barriers for data producers. Additional work with research groups in technology- and engineering science confirmed the need for collaboration in data management. Data producers from these heterogeneous research communities identified benefits for data producers in three clusters: quality improvement, increase in research impact and efficiency (saving time on administration).</p>
<p>Building the data curation infrastructure and setting up the data librarianship were the primary challenges for the library staff. In collaboration with national and international ‘colleagues’ of the data center the project is currently expanding the data set collection and selecting and developing formal license agreements, guidelines and tools, data citability, as well as selection and usage criteria for long-term access to and preservation of research data.</p>
<p>Preliminary conclusions are that while the data curation principle is easily adopted, the data producers will not as easily invest their time in data archiving. Building a data curation facility to meet the diverse needs of heterogeneous research communities requires considerable efforts that can only be realized by (inter)national collaboration between data centers and data users.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Jeroen Rombouts et al.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Leveraging institutional partnerships and individual expertise to support translational science: an extension of the informationist model</title>
<link>http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/7</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In Fall 2009, the Health Sciences Libraries (HSL) and the Institute for Health Informatics (IHI) at the University of Minnesota jointly recruited a new position titled Translational Science Information Specialist and IHI-Library Fellow to serve as library liaison to the University’s Clinical and Translational Science Institute, to co-direct the graduate program in health informatics, and to leverage expertise to support University-wide initiatives in E-Science and data services. The position built on experience with and commitment to the concept of “informationist”. This paper reports the opportunities, challenges and evolving critical role of the Information Specialist as “curator” and “translator” of health data and information among many different organizational entities and community partners.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Layne Johnson et al.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>DataStaR: a data staging repository to support the sharing and publication of research data</title>
<link>http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/8</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The opportunities for new discoveries made possible by the widespread availability of large amounts of data are much in the news, as are the challenges associated with sharing research data and preserving it for the long term. Cornell University Library is engaged in a pilot project (funded by the National Science Foundation) to test the feasibility of a local “staging” repository to support data sharing among research collaborators while research is in progress, and to provide tools and support to publish data to permanent disciplinary or institutional repositories. DataStaR (short for “Data Staging Repository”) aims to leverage local support and infrastructure as well as external resources to ensure access to data. Researchers may store and share data with selected colleagues, select a disciplinary repository or Cornell’s own institutional repository for data publication, create high quality metadata in the formats required by external repositories and Cornell’s institutional repository, and obtain help from data librarians with any of these tasks. Supporting data sharing while research is in progress allows the library to engage with researchers much earlier in the research process, alerting DataStaR staff to opportunities to curate, publish and preserve research data. We describe the overall design and operation of the system, partnerships with Cornell researchers, and the benefits and challenges associated with taking this approach to data curation.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Gail Steinhart</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>The SDSS and e-science archiving at the University of Chicago Library</title>
<link>http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/9</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) is a co-operative scientific project involving over 25 institutions worldwide and managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium (ARC) to map one- quarter of the entire sky in detail, determining the positions and absolute brightness of hundreds of millions of celestial objects. The project was completed in October 2008 and produced over 100 terabytes of data comprised of object catalogs, images, and spectra. While the project remained active, SDSS data was housed at Fermilab. As the project neared completion the SDSS project director (and University of Chicago faculty member) Richard Kron considered options for long term storage and preservation of the data turning to the University of Chicago Library for assistance. In 2007-2008 the University of Chicago Library undertook a pilot project to investigate the feasibility of long term storage and archiving of the project data and providing ongoing access by scientists and educators to the data through the SkyServer user interface. In late 2008 the University of Chicago Library entered into a formal agreement with ARC agreeing to assume responsibility for:</p>
<p>• Archiving of the survey data (long-term scientific data archiving)</p>
<p>• Serving up survey data to the public</p>
<p>• Managing the HelpDesk</p>
<p>• Preserving the SDSS Administrative Record</p>
<p>This paper outlines the various aspects of the project as well as implementation.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Barbara Kern et al.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Lessons learned from a two-year experience in science data literacy education</title>
<link>http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/5</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In spring 2008 and 2009, we offered a course “Scientific Data Management” to undergraduate and graduate students from science and technology majors with support from an NSF CCLI (award #0633447) grant. We actively advertised the course on campus and conducted outreach efforts to individual classes and faculty representing a wide range of science and technology disciplines. Each time the course was offered, we conducted pre- and post-course surveys to assess the instructional effectiveness and learning outcomes. This paper will describe our experience as well as lessons learned in three areas: science faculty perceptions on data management, effect of science curriculum structures on data literacy education, and changes of students’ perceptions and aptitudes, and discuss how the lessons learned will help shape our e- science Librarianship curriculum development, which is being funded by IMLS.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Jian Qin et al.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Library applications, collaborations, and courses for geodata and geoinformatics</title>
<link>http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/6</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This paper will overview several library GIS and geoinformatics projects, collaborations, and initiatives at Purdue that, taken together, formulate a reasonable plan of attack for geolibrarians interested in tackling some (not all) of the issues rolled up into e-geoscience and geoinformatics. Included as examples are a metadata harvesting/catalog project, collaborations with domain faculty, courses developed and taught, and e-data efforts. From this handful of examples an argument will be made that aggressive and efficient individual geolibrarians can impact and indeed steer geoinformatics and interdisciplinary research efforts project by project, then campus by campus, and simultaneously develop and evolve their library data services and strategies. But with a price.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>C. C. Miller</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Get on your boots: a model for low-cost, regional professional development for science librarians at the University of Massachusetts</title>
<link>http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/2</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The University of Massachusetts Five Campus System Science Librarians organized a low-cost, regional professional development program as part of a response to state-wide life science initiatives. Science Boot Camp for Librarians was envisioned as a casual but intensive immersion event into selected scientific subjects that employ networked computing capabilities for research and collaboration. The goal of the event was to provide librarians with subject awareness and networking opportunities to enable them to better engage faculty and research scientists with regard to e-science. This article focuses on the planning and execution of the event as an example of a successful, grass-roots professional development program for librarians engaged with the health and physical sciences.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Maxine Schmidt et al.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>e-Science at the University of Minnesota: a collaborative approach</title>
<link>http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/3</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In 2008 the University of Minnesota Libraries formed the E-science and Data Services Collaborative (EDSC). The group was formed amid an environment of emerging initiatives related to e-science at the University, and was intended to leverage our existing expertise, such as our nationally recognized assessments of researcher behavior, to develop new capacity and engage with campus partners to support e-science and data services. We will report on the EDSC’s progress to date, including the following four areas of focus:</p>
<p>•	A Data Stewardship Report assessing requirements for support of e-science and data services, determining gaps in our capacity, and seeking out opportunities to develop necessary expertise including data curation, data preservation, data policies and virtual organizations.</p>
<p>•	A staff education program assessing the needs of libraries staff related to e-science and data services to establish a position description framework that includes E-scholarship: a potential new model for library liaison roles across campus that supports interdisciplinary and data intensive research.</p>
<p>•	In coordination with the University’s Research Cyberinfrastructure Alliance (members include the Libraries, Office of Information Technology, Office of the Vice President for Research, and Minnesota Super Computing Institute), a two-phased plan for a Web Development project that defines our core services and areas of expertise in “data services” in the context of other campus services and initiatives.</p>
<p>•	Increasing campus awareness of data management issues through the creation of a library Web site and skills-based workshop for faculty, students and researchers about data management best practices and university policies, including those that support open data initiatives.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lisa Johnston et al.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Coordinated research support services at Queensland University of Technology, Australia</title>
<link>http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/4</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Queensland University of Technology (QUT) is a large multidisciplinary university located in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. QUT is increasing its research focus and is developing its research support services. It has adopted a model of collaboration between the Library, High Performance Computing and Research Support (HPC) and more broadly with Information Technology Services (ITS).</p>
<p>Research support services provided by the Library include the provision of information resources and discovery services, bibliographic management software, assistance with publishing (publishing strategies, identifying high impact journals, dealing with publishers and the peer review process), citation analysis and calculating authors’ H Index. Research data management services are being developed by the Library and HPC working in collaboration.</p>
<p>The HPC group within ITS supports research computing infrastructure, research development and engagement activities, researcher consultation, high speed computation and data storage systems , 2D/ 3D (immersive) visualisation tools, parallelisation and optimization of research codes, statistics/ data modeling training and support (both qualitative and quantitative) and support for the university’s central Access Grid collaboration facility. Development and engagement activities include participation in research grants and papers, student supervision and internships and the sponsorship, incubation and adoption of new computing technologies for research. ITS also provides other services that support research including ICT training, research infrastructure (networking, data storage, federated access and authorization, virtualization) and corporate systems for research administration.</p>
<p>Seminars and workshops are offered to increase awareness and uptake of new and existing services. A series of online surveys on eResearch practices and skills and a number of focus groups was conducted to better inform the development of research support services.</p>
<p>Progress towards the provision of research support is described within the context organizational frameworks; resourcing; infrastructure; integration; collaboration; change management; engagement; awareness and skills; new services; and leadership.</p>
<p>Challenges to be addressed include the need to redeploy existing operational resources toward new research support services, supporting a rapidly growing research profile across the university, the growing need for the use and support of IT in research programs, finding capacity to address the diverse research support needs across the disciplines, operationalising new research support services following their implementation in project mode, embedding new specialist staff roles, cross-skilling Liaison Librarians, and ensuring continued collaboration between stakeholders.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Martin Borchert et al.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>The e-research center: transforming a traditional science library</title>
<link>http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/1</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>At the University of New Mexico Libraries (UL) a year long process engaged faculty, students and library personnel in developing a new mission for the Centennial Science and Engineering Library (CSEL) that will re-purpose it to serve the evolving need for facilitating e-research. The authors discuss the vision of the UL for being at the center of data intensive and cyber-enabled research and the planned development of the eResearch Center (eRC). They share the planning process and ideas to revitalize a 25 year old science and engineering library into a collaborative transdisciplinary research hub. Plans include installing low-latency and high-availability network connections to the eRC to provide access to a fast, dedicated research network, training and resource collaboration with the campus high performance computing center, a visualization lab, collaborative environments, large-format data displays, and the provision of data life cycle management services. Finally, they share experiences and initiatives to involve the library and librarians more directly and deeply in faculty research and grant writing, and in working at a leadership level with the Office of the Vice President for Research</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Martha Bedard et al.</author>


</item>



</channel>
</rss>
