Philip Jackson’s “The Mimetic and the Transformative: Alternative Outlooks on Teaching” is widely read both inside and outside of philosophy of education circles and courses, and is best known for sketching out the long-standing difference between the mimetic and transformative traditions in teaching. In this paper, I argue that we need to move beyond the mimetic/transformative divide to a new tradition of teaching. I make the case that Jackson’s understanding of assessment and adaptive education are unduly limiting, and that this keeps his thinking bound to a dualism that needs to be reconstructed. Once reconstructed, new possibilities for philosophers of education, teacher educators, and teachers are disclosed.
Project Muse URL
"Bound to the Mimetic or the Transformative? Considering Other Possibilities,"
Education and Culture: Vol. 33
, Article 3.
Available at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/eandc/vol33/iss1/art3