Evaluation of differential cognitive responses to anger -provoking situations

Sunde Michele Nesbit, Purdue University

Abstract

Previous research using the Articulated Thoughts during Simulated Situations paradigm has found this strategy to be useful in the measurement of cognitive and behavioral responses to a variety of emotionally relevant situations. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the utility of videotaped situations in the assessment of anger experience while driving. Ninety-eight undergraduate participants completed several questionnaires and participated in a visual imagery paradigm. Contrary to what was expected, individual differences were not found for any of the key outcome variables. Situation differences were found for most of the outcome variables. Findings are discussed from the perspective that these situations can be useful in the assessment and treatment of anger responses.

Degree

Ph.D.

Advisors

Conger, Purdue University.

Subject Area

Psychotherapy

Off-Campus Purdue Users:
To access this dissertation, please log in to our
proxy server
.

Share

COinS