Simple uncertainty propagation for early design phase aircraft sizing

Annelise Lenz, Purdue University

Abstract

Many designers and systems analysts are aware of the uncertainty inherent in their aircraft sizing studies; however, few incorporate methods to address and quantify this uncertainty. Many aircraft design studies use semi-empirical predictors based on a historical database and contain uncertainty – a portion of which can be measured and quantified. In cases where historical information is not available, surrogate models built from higher-fidelity analyses often provide predictors for design studies where the computational cost of directly using the high-fidelity analyses is prohibitive. These surrogate models contain uncertainty, some of which is quantifiable. However, rather than quantifying this uncertainty, many designers merely include a safety factor or design margin in the constraints to account for the variability between the predicted and actual results. This can become problematic if a designer does not estimate the amount of variability correctly, which then can result in either an “over-designed” or “under-designed” aircraft. “Under-designed” and some “over-designed” aircraft will likely require design changes late in the process and will ultimately require more time and money to create; other “over-designed” aircraft concepts may not require design changes, but could end up being more costly than necessary. Including and propagating uncertainty early in the design phase so designers can quantify some of the errors in the predictors could help mitigate the extent of this additional cost. The method proposed here seeks to provide a systematic approach for characterizing a portion of the uncertainties that designers are aware of and propagating it throughout the design process in a procedure that is easy to understand and implement. Using Monte Carlo simulations that sample from quantified distributions will allow a systems analyst to use a carpet plot-like approach to make statements like: “The aircraft is ‘P’% likely to weigh ‘X’ lbs or less, given the uncertainties quantified” without requiring the systems analyst to have substantial knowledge of probabilistic methods. A semi-empirical sizing study of a small single-engine aircraft serves as an example of an initial version of this simple uncertainty propagation. The same approach is also applied to a variable-fidelity concept study using a NASA-developed transonic Hybrid Wing Body aircraft.

Degree

M.S.

Advisors

Crossley, Purdue University.

Subject Area

Aerospace engineering

COinS